9/11 Doubts

AFP (France) in an article titled Iran foreign ministry backs Ahmadinejad Sept 11 doubts writes:

Iran's foreign ministry on Sunday backed the doubts expressed by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejed about the accepted version of the September 11, 2001 attacks, saying there were "many ambiguities."
Ahmadinejad last week caused controversy when he described the airborne attacks on New York and Washington by Al-Qaeda militants as a "suspect event" and cast doubt on the strikes in three speeches within the space of eight days.
"Regarding 9/11, as long as all the aspects have not been clarified this remains a suspicious incident," foreign ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini told reporters.
"Many analysts and observers who have followed this feel that there are many suspicions and ambiguities. There are many points of ambiguity surrounding it," he added.

I don't get why people like conspiracy theories. I'm not suggesting there has never been any conspiracies around but not all incidents and events involve conspiracy as some people like to believe. It's one thing for some brain-overdosed dude on the street to believe that there is something suspicious about 9/11, but it's a disaster for an official figure in another country to talk like this.
Mr. Wisedude! Questioning all historical events in the last decade does not make you an intelligent person. What's next on the list? Questioning the 1944 invasion of Normandy by the Allied forces? I think there are still many ambiguities about that day. For example we don't know the exact GPS location of all Allied soldiers who landed on the coast. Also, there is a possibility that some of the Nazi soldiers committed suicide before they were arrested. That's a good reason to believe that the Allied forces didn't really accomplish anything on that day! Wake up... or keep sleeping but don't talk.